In a message dated 4/26/08 7:43:29 PM, writes:
Quote:
> Damn, he must really have pissed off someone at the DMV, could it be that
> they are ticked off because the Duttons can come up the river to London
> without paying the traffic fine--------------
>
>
|
Actually, my first reaction was that this was a perfect example of stupid
over-regulated government destroying creative entrepreneurs and their ideas.
After reading more carefully, however, it appears as though he was trying to make
a specific vehicle on request for this guy, with eight seats on a large SUV
type of chassis, and seeing as it was a "one off" design (especially with such a
heavy donor vehicle as a start), it must have been loaded with problems and
design flaws, as even a substantial production run of cars like the Marina had
their quirks.
As this was intended to haul passengers for hire, it would have to be
regulated much more than a personal vehicle, like the Amphicar, as the government is
charged with insuring the safety of the (sometimes) ignorant public. As
individuals, we should be free to take our own calculated risks, but if you are
deriving income from others who are paying you for rides on the river, the
Government feels some responsibility to insure that you will not be killed by the
acts of a profiteer who neglects his responsibilities.
It also appears as though Dutton may have been callous in court, and mocked
either the guy who paid him 30,000 Pounds to build this vehicle, or worse, the
Judge!
I am not saying that he should be sent to jail, but if your kids were hurt or
killed by a vehicle that had an apparent design flaw that could have been
avoided, or that was overlooked because it would have driven the cost up, I think
that you would be seeking some similar recourse.
Personally, I applaud any efforts to be creative and to design new projects,
especially in this day and age, when all creativity has been stifled by cost
and regulations. However, I also understand how greed, and profit concerns can
encourage certain type of entrepreneurs to cut corners and cheapen a product
in such a way that the user (and their paying passengers) may be exposed to
considerable risk of harm. I think that the final analysis cannot be made until
one actually observed the product and the alleged design flaws, which I suspect
included negative buoyancy in a vehicle which is this heavy.
Chas
**************
Need a new ride? Check out the largest site for U.S. used
car listings at AOL Autos.
(
http://autos.aol.com/used?NCID=aolcmp00300000002851)